<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Titanic script</title>
	<link>http://www.jokes-news.com/2007/01/21/the-new-titanic-script/</link>
	<description>Laugh for Fun - Funny, Blonde, Dirty, Women, Yo Mama Jokes</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 05:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://www.jokes-news.com/2007/01/21/the-new-titanic-script/#comment-11599</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jokes-news.com/2007/01/21/the-new-titanic-script/#comment-11599</guid>
		<description>Hahaha I thought that was quite clever. I have watched the movie and loved it, and I have to say I disagree with the other two comments. I found it quite amusing. Obviously they weren't trying to write an in-depth analysis of the characters or the storyline, we are on a JOKES PAGES, there's no need to get serious about it. It's a good movie, and a bit of fun was had writing this script. And to cari, you say it was just stupid, however, saying "but it WAS funny how much it stunk, though. like a skunk. like you. hahaha" is not really the smartest comment that could be made is it?
But you're right, it is pretty stupid, and that's what makes it funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha I thought that was quite clever. I have watched the movie and loved it, and I have to say I disagree with the other two comments. I found it quite amusing. Obviously they weren&#8217;t trying to write an in-depth analysis of the characters or the storyline, we are on a JOKES PAGES, there&#8217;s no need to get serious about it. It&#8217;s a good movie, and a bit of fun was had writing this script. And to cari, you say it was just stupid, however, saying &#8220;but it WAS funny how much it stunk, though. like a skunk. like you. hahaha&#8221; is not really the smartest comment that could be made is it?<br />
But you&#8217;re right, it is pretty stupid, and that&#8217;s what makes it funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cari</title>
		<link>http://www.jokes-news.com/2007/01/21/the-new-titanic-script/#comment-11318</link>
		<dc:creator>cari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jokes-news.com/2007/01/21/the-new-titanic-script/#comment-11318</guid>
		<description>i completely agree with cassie...that was just STUPID. you didn't even REALLY watch the movie, did you, just watched the previews i bet. that honestly was the most horrid script i have ever read. stupid, yet trying to be funny, without success in the least bit. but it WAS funny how much it stunk, though. like a skunk. like you. hahaha it really did suck....i have nothing left to say except i could've written it to make it funny much better, in fact...whatever. it is, as cassie said, simply STUPID.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i completely agree with cassie&#8230;that was just STUPID. you didn&#8217;t even REALLY watch the movie, did you, just watched the previews i bet. that honestly was the most horrid script i have ever read. stupid, yet trying to be funny, without success in the least bit. but it WAS funny how much it stunk, though. like a skunk. like you. hahaha it really did suck&#8230;.i have nothing left to say except i could&#8217;ve written it to make it funny much better, in fact&#8230;whatever. it is, as cassie said, simply STUPID.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cassie</title>
		<link>http://www.jokes-news.com/2007/01/21/the-new-titanic-script/#comment-4697</link>
		<dc:creator>cassie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 21:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jokes-news.com/2007/01/21/the-new-titanic-script/#comment-4697</guid>
		<description>that's so stupid. cal is not one dimensional, which you'd realize if you actually tried to watch the movie rather then watching it to scrutinize it. and she never liked cal nor wanted to marry him. it was a real romance, not a "just because we're pretty" thing. and cal couldnt have shot jack because then HE would be doing something bad rather then his assistant, n'est c'est pas? (not to mention that drowning would be a lot more painful than actually being shot) And how can you blame the actual EVENTS of the accident (lifeboat numbers) on the movie? If you were to go on a cruise would you bother the maker of the ship about the amount of people on the boat versus the amount of lifeboats? Also, Rose could have gone on a lifeboat (twice, she was right next to one and told to get on, yet didn't) but didn't want to.
Whatever, i'm not going to go on. this is just stupid</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s so stupid. cal is not one dimensional, which you&#8217;d realize if you actually tried to watch the movie rather then watching it to scrutinize it. and she never liked cal nor wanted to marry him. it was a real romance, not a &#8220;just because we&#8217;re pretty&#8221; thing. and cal couldnt have shot jack because then HE would be doing something bad rather then his assistant, n&#8217;est c&#8217;est pas? (not to mention that drowning would be a lot more painful than actually being shot) And how can you blame the actual EVENTS of the accident (lifeboat numbers) on the movie? If you were to go on a cruise would you bother the maker of the ship about the amount of people on the boat versus the amount of lifeboats? Also, Rose could have gone on a lifeboat (twice, she was right next to one and told to get on, yet didn&#8217;t) but didn&#8217;t want to.<br />
Whatever, i&#8217;m not going to go on. this is just stupid</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.462 seconds -->
